Did ram really need a motive to kill ravan
Like if suppose the laxman rekha couldnt be crossed by sita then ravan coudnt have kidnapped sita
did ram need a reason to kill ravan wasnt the fact that he was bad and he attempted to kidnap his wife wasnt it a enough motive
should we stand up against evil with full determination only if it affects us straight
i would like to know ur opinions
i have a few reasons lets ms know yours
and
My next article will be ram the king and krishna the kingmaker
And actually i was visiting a few temples yesterday people contribute so much for temples it is good but how many poor people does it reach
viveknanda rightly said before joining ur hands in prayer lend a helping hand
and the net i saw few questions ram could have left the rajya and went with sita to the forest but as per many sources ram woukd request his brothers but tgey would refuse to accept the rajya
ram knew it was no point making them kings as they will always think how the praja pointed hands against sitas purity
The brothers have sacrificed but sitas sacrifice was the ultimate
what do u think guys
I have few more queries in my mind if u ready to share ur opinions will surely post it