Siya Ke Ram 21st May 2016 Written Episode Update

Nyc epi but the curse part was painful…. Now I come to know y siyaram n radhakrishna was away from each other….. They were away just bcoz of this curse n that’s their destiny…. N maharishi brihu said they l be away for darma stapana….. Thats happened siyaram n radhakrishna was separated only for the darmastapna….

Now whoever said radhakrishna relation Was not pure would have come to know that they were away just for darmastapna… If they would have not separated …..darmastapna can’t be happened…..n they should have come to know that radhakrishna n siyaram was always stayed together for dharma n separated for dharma…..
☺☺☺
This epi really cleared everybody’s wrong thought on their separation….☺☺thank u skr for not omitting this part of Ramayana….

Bcoz in many Ramayana this part was omitted so only people who watched those Ramayana took rama wrong….

Super duper hit epi siya aka bhargavi looked awesome., nice.. Thank god indirectly got to view Siam scenes.. Mareech has turned into golden deer but no promos of siya Haran yet??

Fantastic episode. I knew the story only from devaasur sangram but not that Mata laxmi taking birth as bhargavi and bhagvan Vishnu taking new avatar and residing in maharshi bhrigu’s ashram.
Now talking about the episode. Madirakshi and Ashish seen in so many different forms. Madirakshi looked very good in bhargavi’s roop and first time got to see her as Mata laxmi. Ashish also looked nice as lord Vishnu avatar.
I thought mareech became good by ram’s words but he was hiding from ram. Oh no sitaharan might take place in just two days. After swayamvar first time Sita and raavan will face each other. Laxman fear will become reality. The show makers are showing sitaharan differently. Is mareech getting hurt and sita telling ram to bring the deer to cure it mention in any Ramayan. I knew that just wished to keep the deer and the deer was not hurt.

Vansu here is yours answer.
1.I thinks it’s pitamaha visma (debbrata)he always help everyone.but anything does not understand his situation.
2.I like to be suvadra (my fav characture arjun’s most loveliest wife)
3.krishna
4.it’s all-time sita
5.Feb characture Mahabharata is draupadi.
6.I want to ask we know all people’s of society is equal.then most of God avatar why born in the womb of queens (ex-ram,krishna)
7.I have to think it.
8.it’s hanuman
9.when a girl is raped or some how s*xually humiliated by some political party leader’s friend/son/any other relative)the girl rush all police station or higher authority????but any one does not take complain again him.but everywhere the girl is humiliated and anyone don’t believe her (inspite of understanding all became silent)it was said allwhere that it is a plan of opponen party.then a officer(men or women)belive her and without fearing anyone he protest and proove the truth.he is like krishna to the girl.and after that he help the girl to get justice

✏I think I became very serious about the idea but it’s true
10.plz plz plz plz plz continue that.
If I am wrong or anyone can answer the question above,plz do………………………????????

Very happy to see Sita and Ram in a different avatar today…madirakshi ma’am looks so pretty 🙂

epi was truly awesome though the ravan was present. guys i have written a ff. shall i post it ?????

The Mahabhararta has been an all time favourite for me. In this blog I aim to put to words my own perception about the great epic, its characters, and its social and historical relevance.
Thursday, August 16, 2007
Draupadi: An Analysis
I’ve decided to take up the major characters one by one and do a bit of analysis. I’m starting with Draupadi, who happens to be my favourite female of the epic.

Draupadi was the daughter of king Drupada of Panchaal. She was allegedly born out of a sacrifical fire; and her birth was accompanied by an oracle which declared her, “the greatest among all women”, but also warned that she would bring calamity to the Kshatriyas, those of the warrior clan. Perhaps the story of her miracle birth is an allusion to the fact that she was an adopted daughter of the King; or it might be an attempt to glorify her further and ascent her to superhuman status.

Whatever may be her origin, there is no doubt that Draupadi, also called Krishnaa for her dark complexion was the most attractive lady of her time. Time and again, the poet of Mahabharata has been full of praise of her lotus eyes, of her cascade tresses and her beautiful appearance. Arjuna won her at the archery competition; but because of a supposed misunderstanding among the five brothers and their mother, she eventually became the wife of all five. A more feasible explanation (than Kunti unknowingly asking her sons to divide their earnings equally, and them acting accrodingly, considering the princess as a prize) would be that all five of them were so hopelessly mesmerized by her charm that that was only way to ensure harmony among brothers. When Shakuni won her at the dice game, even Dhritarashtra could not hide his excitement; although he hadn’t even seen her. Duryodhana, Karna and Dusshasana always had a lustful eye on her. She must have been in her middle ages when Jayadratha saw her for the first time, and yet he wistfully said,

“Is she of the human kind? I have no need to marry if I can secure this exquisitely beautiful creature. Will this ornament of womankind, this slender-waisted lady of so much beauty, endued with handsome teeth and large eyes, accept me as her lord? I shall certainly regard myself successful, if I obtain the hand of this excellent lady. Having once seen this lady, other women now seem to me like so many monkeys.”

And her beauty aroused similar desires in the minds of Jataasura and Keechaka.

But there are many beautiful women in our literature. What makes Draupadi stand apart is her personality. She is not the kind without her own opinion, nor the one to follow her husbands’ authority timidly. She speaks for herself. She is conscious about her rights and doesn’t falter to point a finger when she sees them violated. She spoke for herself whilst in tears, after Yudhishthira staked and lost her at the dice game, while being disrobed by Dusshasana and insulted by Duryodhana and Karna,. And when all the elders of Hastinapur remained silent, she asked:

” She whom even the winds and the sun had seen never before in her palace is to-day before this assembly and exposed to the gaze of the crowd. Alas, she whom the sons of Pandu could not, while in her palace, suffer to be touched even by the wind, is to-day suffered by the Pandavas to be seized and dragged by this wretch. Alas, these Kauravas also suffer their daughter-in-law, so unworthy of such treatment, to be thus afflicted before them. Where is that virtue for which these kings were noted? Ye Kauravas, I am the wedded wife of king Yudhishthira the just, hailing from the same dynasty to which the King belonged. Tell me now if I am a serving-maid or otherwise. I will cheerfully accept your answer. This mean wretch, this destroyer of the name of the Kurus, is afflicting me hard. Ye Kauravas, I cannot bear it any longer. Ye kings, I desire ye to answer whether ye regard me as won or unwon. I will accept your verdict whatever it be.”

At which, Bhishma, the foremost of the Kurus, t The Mahabhararta has been an all time favourite for me. In this blog I aim to put to words my own perception about the great epic, its characters, and its social and historical relevance.
Thursday, August 16, 2007
Draupadi: An Analysis
I’ve decided to take up the major characters one by one and do a bit of analysis. I’m starting with Draupadi, who happens to be my favourite female of the epic.

Draupadi was the daughter of king Drupada of Panchaal. She was allegedly born out of a sacrifical fire; and her birth was accompanied by an oracle which declared her, “the greatest among all women”, but also warned that she would bring calamity to the Kshatriyas, those of the warrior clan. Perhaps the story of her miracle birth is an allusion to the fact that she was an adopted daughter of the King; or it might be an attempt to glorify her further and ascent her to superhuman status.

Whatever may be her origin, there is no doubt that Draupadi, also called Krishnaa for her dark complexion was the most attractive lady of her time. Time and again, the poet of Mahabharata has been full of praise of her lotus eyes, of her cascade tresses and her beautiful appearance. Arjuna won her at the archery competition; but because of a supposed misunderstanding among the five brothers and their mother, she eventually became the wife of all five. A more feasible explanation (than Kunti unknowingly asking her sons to divide their earnings equally, and them acting accrodingly, considering the princess as a prize) would be that all five of them were so hopelessly mesmerized by her charm that that was only way to ensure harmony among brothers. When Shakuni won her at the dice game, even Dhritarashtra could not hide his excitement; although he hadn’t even seen her. Duryodhana, Karna and Dusshasana always had a lustful eye on her. She must have been in her middle ages when Jayadratha saw her for the first time, and yet he wistfully said,

“Is she of the human kind? I have no need to marry if I can secure this exquisitely beautiful creature. Will this ornament of womankind, this slender-waisted lady of so much beauty, endued with handsome teeth and large eyes, accept me as her lord? I shall certainly regard myself successful, if I obtain the hand of this excellent lady. Having once seen this lady, other women now seem to me like so many monkeys.”

And her beauty aroused similar desires in the minds of Jataasura and Keechaka.

But there are many beautiful women in our literature. What makes Draupadi stand apart is her personality. She is not the kind without her own opinion, nor the one to follow her husbands’ authority timidly. She speaks for herself. She is conscious about her rights and doesn’t falter to point a finger when she sees them violated. She spoke for herself whilst in tears, after Yudhishthira staked and lost her at the dice game, while being disrobed by Dusshasana and insulted by Duryodhana and Karna,. And when all the elders of Hastinapur remained silent, she asked:

” She whom even the winds and the sun had seen never before in her palace is to-day before this assembly and exposed to the gaze of the crowd. Alas, she whom the sons of Pandu could not, while in her palace, suffer to be touched even by the wind, is to-day suffered by the Pandavas to be seized and dragged by this wretch. Alas, these Kauravas also suffer their daughter-in-law, so unworthy of such treatment, to be thus afflicted before them. Where is that virtue for which these kings were noted? Ye Kauravas, I am the wedded wife of king Yudhishthira the just, hailing from the same dynasty to which the King belonged. Tell me now if I am a serving-maid or otherwise. I will cheerfully accept your answer. This mean wretch, this destroyer of the name of the Kurus, is afflicting me hard. Ye Kauravas, I cannot bear it any longer. Ye kings, I desire ye to answer whether ye regard me as won or unwon. I will accept your verdict whatever it be.”

At which, Bhishma, the foremost of the Kurus, t the Kurus, the expert on ethics brooded over the complexity of morality itself and failed to give a clear verdict.

She was fully aware of her identity and never hesitated to remind her husbands that they were the cause of her miseries. The way she lamented to Krishna while in exile at the woods is perhaps rare in world literature:

“Krishna, how could one like me, the wife of Pritha’s sons, the sister of Dhrishtadyumna, and the friend of thee, be dragged to the assembly! Alas, during my season, stained with blood, with but a single cloth on, trembling all over, and weeping, I was dragged to the court of the Kurus! Beholding me, stained with blood in the presence of those kings in the assembly, the wicked sons of Dhritarashtra laughed at me! O slayer of Madhu, while the sons of Pandu and the Panchalas and the Vrishnis lived, they dared express the desire of using me as their slave! O Krishna, I am the daughter in-law of both Dhritarashtra and Bhishma! Yet, O slayer of Madhu, they wished to make of me a slave by force! I blame the Pandavas who are mighty and foremost in battle, for they saw (without stirring) their own wedded wife known over all the world, treated with such cruelty! Oh, fie on the might of Bhimasena, fie on the Gandiva of Arjuna, for they, O Janardana, both suffered me to be thus disgraced by little men! This eternal course of morality is ever followed by the virtuous–viz., that the husband, however weak, protecteth his wedded wife! By protecting the wife one protecteth his offspring and by protecting the offspring one protecteth his own self! One’s own self is begotten on one’s wife, and therefore it is that the wife is called Jaya. A wife also should protect her lord, remembering that he is to take his birth in her womb!

The Pandavas never forsake the person that soliciteth their protection, and yet they abandoned me who solicited it! By my five husbands five sons of exceeding energy have been born of me: all of them of energy that cannot be baffled. For their sake, O Janardana, it was necessary to protect me! Even as (thy son) Pradyumna, they are, O Krishna, mighty warriors all! They are foremost of bowmen, and invincible in battle by any foe! Why do they bear the wrongs inflicted (on me) by the sons of Dhritarashtra of such contemptible strength? Deprived of their kingdom by deception, the Pandavas were made bondsmen and I myself was dragged to the assembly while in my season, and having only a single cloth on! Fie on that Gandiva which none else can string save Arjuna and Bhima and thyself, O slayer of Madhu! Fie on the strength of Bhima, and fie on the prowess of Arjuna, since, O Krishna, Duryodhana hath drawn breath even for a moment! Why do these that are gifted with strength and possessed of the prowess of the lion, sit indifferently, beholding me thus afflicted by enemies so despicable? Suffering such wrongs at the hands of wicked and evil-doing foes of small strength, am I to burn in grief so long? Born I was in a great race, coming into the world in an extraordinary way! I am also the beloved wife of the Pandavas, and the daughter-in-law of the illustrious Pandu! The foremost of women and devoted to my husbands, even I, O Krishna, was seized by hair, O slayer of Madhu, in the sight of the Pandavas, each of whom is like an Indra himself! ”

And yet she didn’t abandon them; and yet she accompanied them during their exile at the forests for 12 years (as the only wife to do so), and later at King Viraata’s palace in cognito as a parlourmaid; even though opportunities were many. And when Dhritarashtra wanted to grant her a wish in order to appease her after her insult she asked for the freedom of her husbands; the same husbands who had gambled her away as a mere wealth item moments ago. When Satyabhama mockingly asked her about the secret of her relationships with the Pandavas, what she replied essentially meant that she was obedient to them always and never did anything that may disturb them in any way.

Draupadi had with her five of the best men of the generation, in terms of glamour, might and handsomeness; and apart from the incident at the dice game they did their best to protect her. They honoured her and were eager to make her happy. Of course, the relationships she shared with them were not identical; each were special in their own way. She looked up to Yudhishthira as somewhat of a naive elderly person; whom she censured often for his ultra righteous notions and for being the root cause of their travails at the wilderness but also loved and respected in a sympathetic manner. Nakula and Sahadeva were like young ones of the family needed to be taken care of, and to be sheltered from the adversities of life. Bhima and Arjuna had more important roles. Arjuna was the one who had won her through a competition of the utmost skills of archery, and either for that reason or simply because of his fascinating personality she had a pronounced preference for him. That preference was reflected when she eyed Subhadra with an askance look when the latter arrived as Arjuna’s new wife. When she fell during the “ascent to heaven”, Yudhishthira asserted that her love was prejudiced towards Arjuna, and that brought about her downfall. Arjuna (who had several other wives as well), on the other hand, apparently had a preference for Subhadra. Bhima was probably the most devoted lover and husband that Draupadi had. He was the first to take bloodcurdling oaths at the Kuru court vowing to smash Duryodhana’s thighs and to drink Dusshasana’s blood. Draupadi knew of his passionate feeling towards her and made good use of it too. Whenever she needed something to be done, be it serious (like punishing Keechaka) or trivial (like acquiring the thousand-petal lotus); she relied on Bhima. She well understood the psychology of her men and she motivated them accordingly.

She bore five sons to the five Pandavas. Although she loved them dearly, she probably didn’t see much of them as they grew up at Dwaraka under the watchful eyes of Subhadra while the Pandavas and Draupadi spent their thirteen years of exile. The youths survived the great battle but ultimately fell prey to the butcherly night time ambush by Ashwatthama; and in one night Draupadi lost all five of them, along with her brothers Dhrishtadyumna and Shikhandi. And sadly enough, either because their nerves were hardened by eighteen days of gory warfare, or because of the lack of a genuine affection; the Pandavas did not react in a way they should have reacted. Apart from Yudhishthira, nobody appeared to be too affected, and the culprit was ultimately let go on the pretext of being Guru-putra, or the son of a teacher; which was a lame excuse as the Guru or the teacher Drona himself had already been killed in the war.

Draupadi is worshipped as an ideal woman like Sita in south india, but she is mentioned as one of the five maidens of India (Panchakanya) whose rememberance relieves one from all his sin in whole India. She epitomizes quite precisely “the woman of substance” that feminism so much speaks of today, and the world needs more like her kind for its own good. In all her tragedy, she proudly stands as a dignified lady; strong, determined and exceedingly powerful….

guys I know I said I l submit it as a article but I don’t know it l be posted r not…. I m n doubt with my submitting….. so I posted it as a cmnt…. hope u dont mind pls rply here….